California ADS Regulations (FEHA)

California's Automated Decision System (ADS) regulations, adopted by the Civil Rights Council under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), extend the state's existing anti-discrimination framework to AI and algorithmic tools used in employment decisions such as hiring, promotion, and termination.

What Is an ADS Under California's Framework?

An ADS is defined broadly to include any computational process that makes or facilitates a decision, including tools that screen resumes, score assessments, or analyze facial expressions or speech patterns in interviews. The definition is intentionally technology-neutral, covering both AI-branded tools and simpler automated scoring systems.

How Does This Extend Existing FEHA Protections?

FEHA already prohibited employment discrimination based on protected characteristics. The ADS regulations clarify that using an automated tool doesn't create a shield from liability — if an ADS produces a discriminatory outcome, the employer is liable under the same disparate impact and disparate treatment theories that apply to human decision-makers, covered in more detail in disparate treatment vs. disparate impact.

Are Employers Required to Keep Records?

Yes. The regulations generally require employers to retain records related to ADS use — including the data and criteria the tool relies on — for a set retention period, which supports investigations if a discrimination complaint is filed with the state's Civil Rights Department.

Does California Require a Bias Audit Like NYC?

California's approach is less prescriptive than NYC Local Law 144; it doesn't mandate a specific independent audit format or public posting of results. Instead, it operates through FEHA's existing liability framework, meaning the practical incentive to self-audit comes from litigation risk rather than a compliance checkbox.

Do Third-Party ADS Vendors Share Liability?

The regulations extend potential liability to agents that assist employers with ADS-based decisions, not just the employer directly. This means an HR tech vendor providing the screening tool can also face exposure, which changes the leverage employers have in vendor negotiations around indemnification and audit cooperation.

How Should HR Teams Approach Compliance?

Treat any AI-assisted screening, scoring, or interview-analysis tool as a potential ADS and apply the same rigor used for candidate screening generally: document what data the tool uses, retain records per the required period, and periodically test for disparate outcomes even without a state mandate to do so — since FEHA liability doesn't require a failed audit to attach, only a discriminatory result.

Discover how our HR solutions streamline onboarding, boost employee engagement, and simplify HR management

Request a Demo

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What agency adopted California's ADS regulations?
A: The Civil Rights Council, which implements regulations under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA).

Q: Does California require a specific bias audit for ADS tools?
A: No, the regulations don't mandate a specific independent audit format, unlike NYC's Local Law 144.

Q: What counts as an ADS under California's rules?
A: Any computational process that makes or facilitates an employment decision, including resume screening and interview analysis tools.

Q: Are employers required to keep records of ADS use?
A: Yes, generally including the data and criteria the tool relies on, for a set retention period.

Q: Can a third-party AI vendor be liable under these regulations?
A: Yes, agents assisting employers with ADS-based decisions can also face exposure, not just the employer.

Q: Does an employer need a failed audit to face liability under FEHA?
A: No, liability attaches based on discriminatory outcomes, not on whether a formal audit was conducted or failed.